The Climax of Rome
Michael Grant, Weidenfeld, London, 1968.
Yes, the Romans were descendents through the House of Israel too. At least, the upper classes and leadership were so. The upper crust of the House of Israel fled to the Greek isles around 850 b.c. to escape Assyrian invasions. Out of them, the area emerged from "The Dark Age of Greece" by 800 b.c. and the age of "Classical Greece" began over the next 500 years. Greeks (Israelites) colonized the southern 1/3rd of Italy as well as the island of Sicily beginning around 600 b.c. and, as is typical, these Israelites (i.e. WHITE PEOPLE) rose to the TOP over all the indigenous peoples (such as the Etruscans in the north) to become the intelligentsia, emperors, poets, etc. of the future Empire of Rome. This MUST be true anyway as Romans carried out the actual crucifixion of Jesus/Yeshua. God would not have allowed non-Israelite people to do this, but ONLY His own people. But the Jews were only ONE of the two Houses of Israel, namely The House of Judah. Where was the other House? The only other group involved was The Romans. THEREFORE, Romans were the other House of Israel. This makes perfect sense also because the Roman empire stretched out to encompass ALL the lands where Israelites had spread. So the government in Rome could represent them all.
The Revolutionary War
Bart McDowell, National Geographic Society, 1967.
A good summary of the War for American Independence. Lots of pictures and battle maps to cover this the establishment of a new land of a tribe of Israelites (that of Mannassa) that was a fullfillment of the prophecy that Mannassa would split off from Ephraim (the British).
Let The Word Go Forth -- The Speeches, Statements, and Writings of John F. Kennedy
ed. by Theodore C. Sorensen, Delacorte Press, 1988.
A lot of history here. If only we knew who we are.
--RPC, Houston, TX