About Me

Name: raygun
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Best Books List #8 -- Race

Race Card: White Guilt, Black Resentment, and The Assault On Truth And Justice  by David Horowitz,  Prima,  1997

Hating Whitey: and Other Progressive Causes  by  David Horowitz,  Spence,  1999

White Guilt  by  Shelby Steele,  Harper Collins,  2006

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Best Books List #6 -- Morality

Slouching Towards Gomorrah  by  Robert H. Bork,  Regan Books (Harper Collins),  1996

The Death Of Right And Wrong  by Tammy Bruce,  Prima Publ.,  2003

Godless  by Ann Coulter,  Crown Forum,  2006

Bankrupt  by David Limbaugh,  Regnery,  2006

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Timing Of The Passover Week Holy Days

The High Day of Passover this Spring begins at sunset Thursday eve NOT Wednesday eve as the official Jewish calendar chooses. How can this calendar be wrong? After all, so many Jews and Sabbath-keeping Christians have been following this calendar by tradition for so many centuries. Well, that is the problem -- we have been following TRADITION rather than the Biblically specified way of counting days. The calendar was changed in 150 AD by the head EARTHLY rabbi at the time, Hillel. Jesus/Yashua, the TRUE head Rabbi, though in Heaven rather than on Earth, never authorized this change.

Day One of the Spring (spiritual) calendar begins ON the day that we can see the first sliver of the new moon. I have always gone by an article that appeared in Sky and Telescope magazine in 1985. It discussed the results of a study to find out what is the earliest after new moon that a person could SEE the moon. The result was 13 hours. Translating that for this year (2009), we find that the moment of New Moon is 11:07am CDT on March 26th, 2009 (times calculated for Houston, TX). Adding 13 hours to that puts us at just after midnight later that night. But, we can't SEE the moon at that time as it is still so close to a sun that is toward the other side of the planet! We CAN SEE the moon the next day even before sunset as then it would be, say, 32 hours after the moment of New Moon. So, this day March 27th was the DAY 1 of the New Year and we count to the 15th day to get to the Passover High Day, Thursday/Friday the 9th/10th.

The problem with the Hillel calendar is that Day 1 was changed to fall on the ACTUAL day that the New Moon occurs astronomically. This is why, then, Day 1 by this false calendar was Thursday, March 26th and the Passover by this false count falls on Wed/Thursday of this week. By following this since 1993, I estimated that the Hillel calendar is OFF from the correct count about 85 percent of the time. And, this brings up the second problem with the Hillel calendar.

The Hillel calendar has a very definite POLITICAL component. Whoever does the official counts each year ADJUSTS the days so as to ensure that no Holy Day will ever fall on a Sunday or on any other "christian" holiday such as Easter or Christmas. Christians, does this sound like something that God would do or allow? Yet, ironically, this explains why the Hillel calendar gets it right ocassionally. It does so accidentally!

Now for the final major problem with the Hillel calendar: It only recognizes THREE of the EIGHT Holy Days! It only acknowledges Passover, Rosh haSannah, and Atonement. If the Jewish people, who are not even Christians, were representing God's Fourth Commandment in a TRUE way, why then do they not include the other five Holy Days?

The final irony here is that, this season, a Holy Day actually falls on a Sunday. In fact, it falls on Easter Sunday. It is NOT Easter for that day was a Catholic syncretism of a pagan observance. But the day is actually called The Feast Of Firstfruits. It always falls on a Sunday and was the day in 30 A.D. of Jesus/Yashua's resurrection.

So, this week, we have THREE Sabbaths in a row from sundown Thursday through till sunset Sunday. This is two High Days with a regular weekly Saturday Sabbath in between.

--Keep The Faith,

--Ray Curtis.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How To Observe Each Saturday Sabbath

The weekly Sabbath begins AT SUNDOWN on Friday night and lasts until SUNDOWN Saturday eve.  One observes it in six simple ways: 1) do no servile (money-making) work, 2) do not buy or sell anything, 3) do no travel (that is, outside your city limits), 4) do not lift any heavy load(s), 5) do not engage in any personal pleasures (such as movies, games, entertainment TV, etc.) and 6) meet with other christians in some way or place (it's referred to as a Holy Convocation).   These are not man-made criteria.  Each of them is spelled out in the books Exodus through Deuteronomy from the mouth of God.  To observe them is NOT to go back under the Law as Paul writes in Galatians.  There he was referring to the man-made pagan laws of that region of Asia Minor.  Those people were NOT Jews nor lost House Israelites, and so, their laws were NOT derived from The Bible.  When men add law to God's Law, we do not have to obey it.  But we DO HAVE to obey Law that God speaks Himself if it is FOUNDATIONAL LAW.  The 10 Commandments are part of FOUNDATIONAL LAW and the sabbaths are #4 of them.  You will find that God will specially bless you in some way if you begin to keep the sabbaths.  It may be a job if you are unemployed, or some new insight of knowledge, or something else specific to your situation.  Try it.  Put Him to the test in a similar way that we do for the tithe at the end of Malachi.  He promises there to open the stores of Heaven and I have seen BOTH the tithe and the Sabbath obediences to work for me!
--Ray Curtis,  Friday  February 27, 2009
e-mail me if you have any questions about this --    rc_peak@yahoo.com  
   .
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Holy Days #5

Pentecost

The Fourth High Day in the annual timeline is Pentecost. It comes 7 weeks after The Feast of Firstfruits Day and is always on a Sunday.

This is the Day in 30A.D. that The Holy Spirit descended on disciples that were meeting to observe the Day. Thus began the so-called "Church Age". I believe it should more properly be called "The Holy Spirit's Age". This Age will end when, on that last Pentecost of The Tribulation Period, The Holy Spirit is taken out from The World to make way for God's final Judgements. So we see the dual fullfillments again of a Holy Day.

The Feast of Weeks ( or Feast of Firstfruits ) represents this Holy Spirit Age that we are still in. The fact that this 7 week period is bracketed by 2 always-on-Sunday Days is God's way of picturing to us that Sunday has indeed been the principle Day of Worship these last almost 2,000 years. The 4th Commandment meanwhile, has been kept by observing the annual Holy Days. Those Christians who have NOT been keeping The Holy Days have been sinning thereby. And, all pastors who have never instructed their flocks to keep the Days will be in a precarious and embarrassing position on Judgement Day!

--RPC, Saturday February 14, 2009

I will take a break for awhile on the Holy Day series to do other articles and book reviews. Will resume in August with the 4 Fall Days.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Holy Days #4

Second High Day Of Passover Week

The third High Day on the annual timeline is The Second High Day Of Passover Week. It is the last of The Days of Unleavened Bread. It is the 22nd day from the new moon. No common name exists for it that I know of, so I call it "Rapture Day" because I believe that this will be the ACTUAL Day that live Christians will be taken up out of the world in order to get them out of the way so that God can pour out His final judgements on the sin-sick and God-rejecting.

The FIRST fullfillment of this Day was in 1221 B.C. when The Israelites crossed The Red Sea. Only THEN had they left Egypt. This spot crossed today's Gulf of Aqaba. The Israelites entered Midian ( in today's Saudi Arabia ) and made their way to Mt. al Laws, as Arabs refer to it. Egypt, in prophetic type, represents 'The World' and, so, by crossing the Red Sea, The Israelites left 'The World'. And, 'The World', represented by the Pharoah and his army, had final judgement POURED out on them via the waves of the sea AFTER God's people had been taken out of the way! Do you see the parallels? So, 'The Rapture' will be the next, second, fullfillment of this Day - ON this Day!

A parable of Jesus is appropriate here: the ten virgins who awaited the bridegroom. 5 were ready. 5 were not. We each need to be SURE that we are ready ON THAT DAY if we do not want to be LEFT OUT!

--Ray Curtis, Tuesday February 10, 2009

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Holy Days #3

The Feast Of First Fruits

The second High Day on the annual timeline is The Day of Firstfruits. It is always on a Sunday (by our modern calendar) and begins the 7 week Feast of Firstfruits (also called The Feast of Weeks). This feast ends with The High Day of Pentecost which is usually in late May or June. Pentecost is also always on a Sunday. What this 7 week period depicts is this so-called "church age" that we have been in since 30A.D. The fact that this time is bracketed by the only two always-on-Sunday High Days is proof that Sunday HAS been the principle day of worship for over 1,900 years. But that is now changing.

The Day of Firstfruits is actually the very day that Jesus/Yashua was resurrected. It was that first day of the week (Sunday) just AFTER sunset on that 7th day (Saturday). He had been deceased and in the tomb since sundown on that Wednesday (exactly 72 hours). The event of His resurrection was the FIRST fullfillment of this Day. Paul referred to Jesus as "Christ the firstfruit". And we, the rest of the true church, were also referred to as firstfruits. So, we can see that the future resurrection of the dead-in-Christ will also be on this Day. It will be in the Spring of the last year of the Tribulation Period.

How is this Day calculated? It falls on the Sunday just after the Saturday Sabbath during the Days of Unleavened Bread. I didn't actually know of it's existence as a High Day until March 2006 when I discovered it in Numbers 28:26 . This is the only verse in The Bible that specifically mentions it as a High Day. So, it is understandable that the sabbatarian churches missed it for so many centuries. They had mistaken this reference to be one concerning Pentecost.

Next: Rapture Day ( my term for it! ).

--RPC, Monday February 9, 2009

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Holy Days #2

Passover And The Days Of Unleavened Bread

The First High Sabbath Day on the annual timeline is The Passover. It is calculated as the 15th day from the new moon that is CLOSEST to the Spring (or vernal) equinox. Thus, it will always occur in our March or April. Holy Days, as with Saturday Sabbaths, begin at sunset on the evening before and go through to the next sunset. This Passover for 2009 will begin at sunset on Thursday April 10th.

The first of the dual fullfillments of Passover occurred in 1221 B.C. when the Israelites were brought out of Egypt under Moses' leadership. The second fullfillment occurred in 30 A.D. with Jesus/ Yashua as the Passover Lamb sacrificed on the afternoon of The Preparation Day, the day just before the High Day.

The next day after The High Day of Passover begins the 6 Days of Unleavened Bread. All Israel is not to eat leavened bread. The only bread eaten is unleavened and some MUST be consumed each day. In fact, Israelites were to get ALL leavening, even crumbs, out of their houses before the week was to begin. The symbolism here is obvious: leavening depicts sin and getting it out of our lives ( or at least trying to ) is the idea here.

I have not yet seen any writing that makes a tie that seems obvious to me: this week of getting sin out of our lives leads directly into the next 2 High Days. These are both resurrection days and will be discussed next.

--RPC, Friday February 6, 2009

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Are The Holy Days?

This introduction begins a series on the annual Holy Days and Feasts of The Bible. What are they? What is their purpose? Should WE as Christians observe them today? There are 8 of them, 4 in the Spring of every year and 4 in the Fall. Descriptions of them can be found in Exodus ch.12 , Leviticus ch. 23 , Numbers ch. 28/29 , and Deuteronomy ch. 16 .

God's Holy Days, to be brief and to the point, are PRE-MEMORIAL DAYS to each of the major events in His plan of salvation for the world. That is, they are memorials given BEFORE the events which they depict are to even occur! And, as such, they provide a POWERFUL witness to the truth of the Bible as THE WORD of THE ONE TRUE GOD. Why then do our mainstream preachers ignore them? All other memorial days from human religions (as with secular governments) are ALWAYS established AFTER the events they depict. This is how we know that all other religions are NOT from The Creator Yahweh.

One key point to notice about these Days: they are NOT some sort of national holidays of the Jews or of Israel generally. They are GOD's days. See Leviticus 23:1 ('My' Feasts). And we ALL are commanded to observe them. This is how we (all Earthlings everywhere) are supposed to have been keeping The Fourth Commandment for the last 1,938 years!

A second point about the Days: they each have a DUAL fullfillment. One is a looking back, while the other is a looking forward in time.

A third point about the Days: those in the Spring generally deal with SPIRITUAL issues and events such as liberation, renewal, resurrection, and Spirit indwelling. The Fall Days generally deal with the PHYSICAL, structural, or governmental aspects of what God is doing.

A fourth and final point: Satan has instilled a complete set of substitute holidays to keep the Church distracted or diverted away from God's true and commanded Days. Each of these will be noted briefly at the end of each Holy Day discussion.

--RPC, Wednesday February 4, 2009

Tomorrow -- DAY ONE: The Passover and The Days of Unleavened Bread.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT THE KINGDOM WILL BE LIKE

Marriage --

This is the WORST time ever in human history to be marrying. It is an even WORSE time to be having kids. This will not be so in The Kingdom Age. And that is why it may be best to put off marriage until that time. What? You didn't know that we WILL be able to marry and have kids, yes, in our resurrection bodies in The Kingdom? Need proof? Read Isaiah 4 verse 1. These seven women want to attach themselves to who? A loser man? No, they obviously would want to be married to a WINNER man! And who will be the WINNER men? Resurrection men! Duh!

Some have seen this passage and argue that it is only allegorical and may refer to different parts of the Christian Church as the Bride of Christ wishing to join Him. But, unless proven otherwise, the BEST interpretation of any passage is, first, the literal one. Also, notice how it flows smoothly as a carryover from the end of chapter 3 where Isaiah says the women of Israel will be ashamed (in that Day of The Lord) of their behavior. And what women do you think most need to be ashamed today? Could they be some of the WHITE girls and women in our sex-crazed western culture? This is another of the MANY proofs that our people are indeed Israelites.

--Ray Curtis, Tuesday February 3, 2009

rc_peak@yahoo.com

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BOOK REVIEWS

The United States And Britain In Prophecy, by Herbert W. Armstrong, (1934)

This is the book that opened the eyes of so many Christians as to who we are as a people. It started my learning of what I now call 'The Great Big Picture Of What's Really Going On'. The book revealed the two main KEYS to understanding Scripture and prophecy. The first KEY, in the first half of the book, is that God's Law is NOT completely done away at the Cross as most of our preachers and theologians lead us to believe. Parts of TEMPORARY LAW ( Law of Moses ) may be suspended, but FOUNDATIONAL LAW is not. The second KEY, in the second half of the book, is that we, the white people of northern Europe, The British Isles, and The United States are direct genetic descendents of the ancient Israelites. We ARE Israel ! I have since concluded that we are, more accurately, a MIX of Israelites into the Celtic people who had previously inhabited Europe when, beginning around 850BC, Israelite people moved in as they fled Assyrian invasions of the northern 10 tribe House Of Israel lands.

This book has been out of print since September 1987 as The World Wide Church Of God began major internal changes. But, a duplicate copy is available for perusal only in the local Christian and Conservative Study Center library ( CCSC ) here in Houston, TX.

--Ray Curtis, Thursday, January 29, 2009

reviews soon to come on the same topic:

The Lost Ten Tribes Of Israel . . . Found ! by Stephen M. Collins (1992)

Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright by J. H. Allen (1902)

The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koester (1976)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Intro - What These Two Blogs Are All About

The 'Politics Is Our Future Blog' and the 'Great Big Picture Blog' reflect the natural duality that is found throughout life. The FIRST will always have articles that deal with The Physical (or structural). Currently, these center on recent political events, but many of the ideas may also carry over into our next life - that 'World Tomorrow' or 'Millenial Kingdom Age'. Thus, there often will be a religion application. Man is a political animal. So, it makes sense that God would want us to learn right political concepts. You didn't know that we will be applying all this political learning not now but in our future assignments in The Kingdom did you?

The SECOND blog will always have articles that deal with The Spiritual. Correcting doctrinal confusion involves seperating out those beliefs that are wrong and nonsensical. A synthesis of the remaining ones should lead to a sudden realization of 'The Great Big Picture'. All of our religious leaders are in the same predicament as Rudyard Kipling's 10 blind men. Each of them touched a different part of an elephant and came to a wrong conclusion as to what an elephant is. Similarly, our preachers and theologians are touching seperate pieces of the Doctrinal Elephant. They cannot see the whole because of the blinders they wear. It is no wonder that the average church goer ignores doctrine as too hard to understand. The bottom line is this - There is no one group that has everything right and nothing wrong. The honor of correcting it all is being reserved for Christ at His coming. And that bottom line applies to these blogs too. But, at least having this right understanding about our place behind the dark glass that we see through will be a good start toward seeing The Whole Elephant.

Semi-regular sections at both blogs will be BOOK REVIEWS and WHAT THE KINGDOM WILL BE LIKE.

--Ray Curtis (aka raygun, aka sitruc),

Houston,TX

Monday January 26, 2009

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack is NOT a Christian

 I do not for a minute believe that Barack Obama is a Christian as he has said. I believe that he has said that he is because he knows that America is an overwhelmingly Christian nation and that he could not get into the White House without this "cloak" of DECEPTION. The best way to see his TRUE religion is to observe the endorsements of his fellow muslims both foreign and domestic. Ahmadinejhad of Iran praises Barack and hopes for his victory. Hamas in the Gaza Strip endorses Barack. Hezbollah in Lebanon endorses Barack. Hugo Chavez, though not a muslim himself, is allied with muslim terrorists and endorses Barack. Khalid Monsour, who started The Black Panthers with Huey Newton and was an attorney to the Saudi Royal family, endorses Barack. Monsour was filmed saying "...take flesh out of their (whites) body ... don't worry - God wants you to do that". Rashid Khalidi, a fervent supporter of a Palestinian State and former press agent for the PLO endorses Barack. CAIR, the infamous islamic subversive group within America endorses Barack. ACORN, the infamous voter fraud organization in America that Barack has always worked closely with, endorses him. The list goes on and on. Other evil radicals in Obama's sphere include Jeremiah Wright, Fr. Flager, Louis Farakhan, who calls Barack "Our Messiah", Bill Ayers the infamous Weather Underground unrepentant terrorist, and Saul Alinski of American Communist Party fame.

The big question is: Why would these muslims endorse Barack if he is a christian? Wouln't that go against their religion? And if Barack CONVERTED from islam to Christianity, don't these (and all other) muslims have to kill him as an infidel? Could it be that they do not entertain such thoughts because they know that he is really STILL a muslim and is only engaging in political deception not unlike their own? Could it be that Barack has no fear of a muslim hit on him because he also knows that he is REALLY, in his own mind, STILL a muslim?

--RPC, Wednesday, Oct 15, 2008

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our Deuteronomy 28 Moment

 "What's your favorite Bible verse and why?"

A few years ago, I would have answered that question with any of the standard popular verses. John 3:16 or Philippians 4:13 ("I can do all things through Him who strengthens me") for example. But for 21 years now, I feel as if I have been in a sort of long seminary class where doctrine finally makes sense. It is not dull and drab and is not stuff that the average christian can't understand. It is not stuff that has to be left up to our church leaders because, after all, they have the Masters and Doctorate degrees. And it is not stuff that, at points, is too ethereal for the human mind to even begin to grasp. When a doctrinal subject can't be believably explained, the usual fallback is, "Well, we'll just have to wait until we get to Heaven and then all will be clear." The doctrine on the trinity is an example. We supposedly can't understand "The Godhead". What then do we make of Paul's statements in Romans 1:19,20 (". . . that which is known about God is evident within them . . . His invisible attributes . . . and divine nature . . . understood through what has been made . . . ")?

I learned about what I call The Structural Doctrines. Most of mainstream Christianity has been strong on and has emphasized the experiential aspects of the christian life. Maybe we could call these The Spiritual Doctrines. These two sides of life are like the sides of a coin. They go together and are inseperable. Or should be. Because the tendency of the fallen human mind is to keep them seperate and to overemphasize one or the other depending on which denominational correctness we allow ourselves to be subject to.

One thing that I began learning in July of 1987 was how to keep The Fourth Commandment. Do not make the mistake that many have made. God's laws have NOT been done away at The Cross of Christ. That idea is one of the "destructive heresies" that Peter warned would soon infiltrate into the church ( 2 Peter 2:1 ). Jesus made it clear: "Do not think I came to abolish the Law . . . I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill." Why then do some of our preachers tell us He came to abolish The Law? See also the rest of Mathew 5:17-20 .

There are two main bodies of l.aw -- Temporary Law which applied from Mt. Sinai until The Cross, and Foundational Law which is for all time and was first given in the Garden of Eden. This Foundational Law most certainly includes The Ten Commandments for people have been murdering, lying, stealing, etc. ever since Adam. All those acts were called sin were they not? And all that sin was punishable was it not? As Romans 5:13 points out: ". . . sin is not imputed when there is no Law." And 1 John 3:4 (KJV): ". . . sin is the transgression of the Law."

It is only the Temporary Law which Paul refers to as having been our teacher or schoolmaster up until The Cross. Most of it can be said to have been suspended for this, so-called, Church Age. But, even so, it cannot be "done away". We notice that Jesus will revive much of that Temporary Law (also known as Law of Moses) in the upcoming Kingdom Age. See the last nine chapters of Ezekiel.

Some might argue, "OK, fine, but the Sabbath Commmandment was added at Mt. Sinai and is therefore temporary." Yes, it was added at that time; but notice, it was put in with and therefore elevated to the level of the Ten Commandments which are Foundational Law. If God had not wanted that Commandment to be at this level, He could just as easily have put it with the other Laws such as priestly garments, sacrifices, the Tabernacle layout, etc.

The conclusion that all of this leads to is an explanation of why a nation such as ours that is full of well-intentioned and godly people can seem to slip-slide into ever deepening danger from enemies, internal moral decay, weakening economy, floods, failing crops, scary weather events, and psychological angst. When we see bad stuff all around us, we understandably react with a certain fear over what is going on. We wonder, "Has God given us up?"

What is happening to America (and Europe) now is a fulfillment of Deuteronomy chapter 28. This is the famous "Blessings and Cursings" chapter. These are to be the results of either obedience or disobedience to God by His people Israel (us by the way, but that subject is for another article). Obedience to what? Well, for starters, how about, oh, I don't know . . . maybe . . . obedience to His Laws? Duh? Um . . . do ya think? First with oh, maybe, how about The Ten Commandments? Here we can apply what James said about them ( James 2:10 ) that if we are guilty of even one of them, we are guilty of them all. Christians like to believe that we are obeying God, but could it be that since we are not keeping that Fourth Commandment properly, we are bringing His correction on ourselves? Read Deuteronomy 28 carefully but substitute "United States of America" at every spot where "Israel" or "My People" or "you" is listed. You will be amazed.

Briefly, I will just summarize here that we don't have to keep the Saturday Sabbath for now. Sunday is indeed the principal day of worship for now. The suspension of Saturday is to last from 70 a.d. when the temple fell until the beginning of The Tribulation Period which should be soon. Christians will have to be ready for this radical life shift. The way that we keep the Fourth Commandment during this so-called Church Age is through The Holy Days. Each of the eight days is a pre-memorial to a key event in God's plan of salvation for the world. That's why it is ridiculous to think that they are done away or were only Jewish national party times. They are actually MORE important for Christians to observe, understand, and learn from. Because what we learn from them is nothing short of the great big picture of what God is doing! If we don't learn from them, we can only have limited, incomplete, speculative and fuzzy ideas on what is really going on.

Our christian leaders' answers to national decline typically involve calling mass prayer events. Whether a "National Day of Prayer" or some kind of big Concert for Jesus or a Walk For Jesus or whatever, a certain naiivete or silliness is usually evident. When did christians fall into the New Age deception that Mass Mind Effort impresses God? It is the lone one who does right before God whose prayer "availeth much". God's heart may then be moved into action. This lone one is thus more effective than 50,000 un-right ones who are locked into some sort of Vulcan mind-meld! And the verse that has become the standard of these super gatherings is 2 Chron. 7:14 ( ". . . and [if] My people . . . humble themselves and pray, and . . . then I will hear from Heaven, will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.").

Finally, we come to my favorite verse. It is Ecclesiastes 12:13 ( "The conclusion, when all has been heard, is: fear God and keep His commandments, because this is the whole of man." [translation by Dr. Haddon Robinson] ). There are two parts to Solomon's conclusion here. The second, keeping the Commandments, is what I had been learning from 21 years ago. The first, fearing God, is what I have been learning about recently. If we don't want to keep His Commandments, how can it be said that we fear Him? And if we don't fear Him, why should He do anything to help us? Why shouldn't He just walk away and leave us to be devoured by enemies (both earthly and spiritual ones)? But God actually showers blessings on those who fear Him. Notice Psalm 34:7 -- "The angel of The Lord encamps around those who fear Him, and rescues them." He also gives wisdom ( Proverbs 9:10 ) and knowledge ( Proverbs 1:7 ) if we fear Him.

Now this word "fear" is a major problem for modern man. We don't like it. We can''t accept it's Biblical use. It is part of the Bible we'd like to cut out and our preachers dutifully comply with our wishes by not daring to include the word or concept in any sermons. Offending the congregation might thin out the offering plate. But "fear", when properly understood, should be preached in or as part of EVERY sermon. The most famous and effective sermon of all time was Jonathan Edwards' "Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God". It was full of references on fearing God and is credited with starting The Great Awakening. A pastor who waters down the word "fear" by saying that, well, it really just means to hold God in "awe" is setting a pathetic example of wimpy leadership. Actually, there are 17 Hebrew words in the Old Testament and 1 Aramaic one that are usually translated as "fear". They have various meanings and only 2 properly mean "awe". The New Testament typically uses "phobos" for all these.

The verse 2 Chron. 7:14 is really dependent on Eccl. 12:13 for it's foundation. For, what does it mean to "humble ourselves" before God? To simply tell a congregation to "humble ourselves" without any explanation that this means to "fear Him and obey Him" reveals a shepherd (pastor) who doesn't know how to lead a flock. And the phrase "My people who are called by My Name specifically refers to Israelites (us by the way, and our shepherds don't know how to lead their flocks on that point either).

So, what is "our Deuteronomy 28 Moment"? There are really two. The first is spelled out in verses 1 through 14 and is the kind of moment we'd all like to have. We want to be the head (on Earth) and not the tail. Sadly, though, we are beginning to enter that other moment. The one where we become the tail and not the head. Where commodity prices rise out of control, where confusion and rebuke comes on all we do, where diseases threaten us, where enemies press in on us to fly planes into our buildings and plan the nuclear destruction of our cities, and where bad ineffective leaders pull us down. Will we flee seven directions from our enemies next?

We can persuade God to turn all this around for us at any time. We must learn what it means to apply Ecclessiastes 12:13 NOW. Let it begin with we, the church.

--Ray Curtis, May 14, 2008

( all verses are from the New American Standard Bible unless otherwise noted. )

 Addendum - January 30, 2009
In the 9th paragraph above, I stated that we do not have to keep the Saturday Sabbath for now.  I believe that it was suspended at the fall of The Temple in Jerusalem in 70AD.  There was actually an overlap of worship days for that first 40 years of the church.  Sunday worship began at Pentecost  30AD while Saturday Sabbath worship also remained until 70AD.  Now, I believe that we are seeing another overlap.  I had thought that Sabbath worship would begin AND REPLACE Sunday as the principle day of worship once the Tribulation Period began.  But, I believe that Saturday Sabbath worship is NOW again  in place by God as of September 12/13th, 2007.  Sunday worship will also continue as A major weekly day of worship up until the last Day of Pentecost in the last year of the Tribulation Period when The Holy Spirit is taken out of the world.  And that last summer will see the most massive judgements by God upon the world just before Christ returns to Earth in September of that year on Rosh  haShannah.   --RPC
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is There Really a HellFire?

                                          Is There Really a Hell Fire?

            By Ronald L. Dart

            Is there really an ever–burning hell where sinners are tormented
            with fire and brimstone throughout all eternity? Is it only for the
            very wicked? What about the “unsaved”? The Bible tells us there is
            only one name given in heaven and earth whereby we must be saved–the
            name of Jesus. What about all those who have never heard that name?
            Do they go immediately to the torments of a fiery hell at death?
            What about babies and little children? Surely they don’t go to hell?
            Churches have an astonishing variety of answers to these questions,
            but what does the Bible say? How can we really know the truth?

            There is no doubt about it, the doctrine of “hell fire” is mighty
            effective. “Heaven,” after all, is a nebulous concept. The preachers
            have given us some idea of harps, angels, clouds, music, milk and
            honey, and streets paved with gold. That’s all fine if it turns you
            on, but does it really sound as exciting as French onion soup, prime
            rib, a bottle of vintage wine, a Mercedes Benz, a private jet,
            interesting friends, weekends in Las Vegas, and vacations on the
            Riviera?

            But if the idea of “heaven” is nebulous, the idea of “hell” is
            downright specific. “Hell fire” is an idea that can change lives.
            Even the thought of experiencing the excruciating pain of sulfurous
            fire for a day, much less all eternity, is something even the
            roughest sinner can understand.

            “Hell fire” is an expedient doctrine, and that in itself should make
            us wonder. You don’t suppose there could be a chance–even a small
            chance–that preachers preach “Hell fire” more because it works than
            because it’s true?

            Has anyone ever lied to you because they believed it was in your
            interests for them to do so? You’re infuriated when you learn about
            it, and no less so because you realize it was done in good will. The
            person may have sincerely believed he was doing the right thing, but
            he took away from you an inalienable right: the right to know the
            truth and to make your own decision. He also destroyed,
            incidentally, an important element of trust; for, whatever the
            motives involved, he lied to you.

            Jesus said, “You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you
            free.” No matter how well meaning, if a preacher causes you to
            believe something that isn’t quite true, then you’re not quite free.
            And, when you don’t do the right thing because it is the right
            thing, will God give you credit when you do the right thing because
            of a lie?

            If there’s even a remote possibility that someone has lied to us
            about an important matter of doctrine, we owe it to ourselves to
            check it out. If the doctrine of “hell fire” is true, then it should
            be a simple matter to prove it in the Bible. Paul admonished the
            Thessalonians to “prove all things and hold fast to that which is
            good.” Luke wrote of the Bereans saying: “These were more noble than
            those in Thessalonica, because they searched the scriptures daily to
            prove whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11).
            There is no reason to be defensive or fear the truth–let’s give this
            doctrine an honest look.
           
The Idea of Hell
            “Hell” in theological usage is a place of punishment after death.
            Although there exists a bewildering array of doctrines on hell,
            there are some broadly accepted elements. Hell is generally
            conceived as a place beneath the surface of the earth, for example.
            It is a place where the wicked are tormented by fire, suffering
            excruciating pain–both the pain of loss and pain of the senses.
            Somehow the fire causes pain but does not consume. It torments, but
            the usual relief caused by the destruction of nerves and tissue,
            passing out, or numbness, is denied the sufferer.

            And just how long does this go on? Since man is believed to have an
            immortal soul, his torment continues time without end, unremitting,
            for all eternity. And how long is eternity? I heard a preacher
            explain that once.
            He asked his audience to imagine a mountain of granite one mile high
            at the peak and one mile in diameter at the base. He then asked us
            to imagine that once a year a small bird flew to the peak of that
            mountain of granite and proceeded to polish its beak. When that
            small bird, polishing its beak once a year, has worn that mountain
            of granite down to a pebble you can hold in your hand, one day of
            eternity shall have passed!

            Just how bad do you have to be to warrant this kind of punishment
            for that long?
            Roman Catholic theologians distinguish four meanings of the term
            hell: (1) Hell in the strict sense of the term, or the place of
            punishment for the damned, be they demons or men; (2) The limbo of
            infants (limbus parvulorum) where those who die in original sin
            alone, and without personal mortal sin, are confined and undergo
            some kind of punishment; (3) The limbo of the fathers (limbus
            patrum), in which the souls of the just who died before Christ
            awaited their admission to heaven: for in the meantime heaven was
            closed against them in punishment for the sin of Adam; (4)
            Purgatory, where the just, who die in venal sin or who still owe a
            debt of temporal punishment for sin, are cleansed by suffering
            before their admission to heaven (Catholic Encyclopedia, article
            “Hell”).
 
            There are two very disturbing ideas presented here. First, infants,
            babes of a few days, weeks, or months, who have never committed
            personal sin are consigned to a compartment of hell for “some kind
            of punishment.” Why? Because of “original sin”–the sin of Adam! So
            say the Catholics.
            But consider: Are they still babies in this “limbo”? Do they
            understand their punishment? What does it accomplish to punish
            infants a week old?

            Second, consider the implications of the doctrine of purgatory.
            Observe carefully that it is the just who go to purgatory for
            punishment, not the ignorant. Even if we agree that temporary
            punishment for those who sin without knowing any better is not too
            far fetched, the people who go to purgatory for punishment are good
            people!

            What then of the ignorant? What of those who have never heard the
            name of Christ–the only name given in heaven and earth whereby we
            must be saved? These are considered “the heathen,” or “the damned”
            and are consigned, not to purgatory, but to a permanent place in
            hell. Unless we understand this, some of the actions of the Roman
            Catholic Church in history are incomprehensible.

            When the Spaniards came to the New World, for example, they came not
            only to conquer, but to convert. The Spanish were filled with all
            the fire of a religious crusade, “Because the Spanish faith was
            real, and America had two continents filled with heathen, even the
            Spaniard who came for lands, riches, or to raise his station in life
            arrived with a ready, and unshakable rationale for conquest” (Lone
            Star, by T.R. Fehrenback, page 21). When Vasquez de Coronado asked
            his priest about the ethics of impressing several Indian girls into
            his wife’s service, he was told that “While the captives were not
            technically subject to the crown or laws of Spain, but free agents,
            if they were allowed to go free they would remain heathen and
            unquestionably burn in hell forever.” However, under the benign
            supervision of Coronado’s wife, “The girls would learn both European
            civilized values and adopt the true faith, ensuring their eventual
            entry into paradise. The real crime would not be in enslaving them,
            but in letting them go free. Coronado was satisfied; the girls were
            kept in bondage, and passed from recorded history” (Lone Star, pages
            21 and 22).

            Protestant doctrine, of course, differs radically from Catholic
            doctrine in many respects. However, the roots of the doctrine of
            “hell fire” still remain firmly entrenched in early Roman Catholic
            theology. Protestants have long since disposed of any idea of an
            interim state such as purgatory, and allow only two conditions after
            death–heaven or hell.

            If you want to have an interesting evening, sit down with someone
            who claims to sincerely believe that when a person dies he
            immediately goes to either heaven or hell. See if you can sort out
            with him precisely who goes where and why. By and large they will
            tell you that there are two categories of people in the world–the
            saved and the lost. When they die, the saved go to heaven and the
            lost go to hell.  So far so good.

            But how does a person get “saved”? Well, he has to accept Jesus
            Christ as his personal Savior and be baptized. Since there is “no
            other name given in heaven or earth where we must be saved,” than
            the name Jesus, then it’s obviously impossible, isn’t it, for a
            person to be saved without hearing that name?

            Some form of belief, confession, and baptism is required for
            salvation according to most Protestant denominations. As Paul put
            it, “Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved”
            (Romans 10:13). But he continues with an important question: “How
            then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how
            shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall
            they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach except they
            be sent?” (verses 14, 15). It is, of course, in such scriptures that
            the missionary movement firmly places its roots.

            But what about children who are not old enough to understand? This
            presents a disturbing problem to most Protestants, and various
            attempts at rationalizing it have been suggested. Some allow that
            children, up to a certain age, are not lost, but are born “saved.”
            They become lost when they commit sin. Others suggest that prior to
            a certain age, children are not held accountable for sin and speak
            of an “age of accountability.” No one really knows what that age is,
            and children are baptized at very young ages–certainly long before
            they understand many of the implications of what they are doing.

            There are many who claim to believe some version of this doctrine,
            but it is difficult to see the fruits of this belief in their lives.
            The death of an infant or child is always an occasion of terrible
            grief to a family, and rightly so. But somehow the grief of the
            family at the funeral stands in stark contrast to the glowing words
            of the preacher who claims that the child is now in heaven playing
            with the angels. Preachers have even suggested that God wanted these
            tiny flowers in His own garden, thus casting God in the role of
            selfishly taking children away from loving parents because He wanted
            them for Himself.  The logic of all this is highly suspect, but what is more
            important,  none of it is supported anywhere in the Bible!
           
The Heathen
            Then there is the perplexing question of “the heathen.” All
            Christians know that out there in the world there are all sorts of
            people who have never heard the name of Jesus Christ. They are
            utterly ignorant of His gospel and have no knowledge of the way of
            salvation. Is it just to take a person who never had a chance to be
            saved, send him immediately to hell at death, and torment him for
            all eternity?

            Now all of us know people who claim they believe this doctrine. But
            what kind of behavior would you expect of people who sincerely
            believed that there was a lost world out there, destined to eternal
            torture in hell, a world depending on them to receive the gospel of
            salvation? Would you expect a church that believed such doctrines to
            be building a magnificent, expensive family life center, installing
            gorgeous stained glass windows, or even air conditioning units?
            Wouldn’t you expect them to be sending every dime they could lay
            their hands on to the mission fields?

            I was talking with a man once who claimed to sincerely believe in
            hell fire. He was taking me firmly to task because I didn’t believe
            as he did. I brought him quickly to the core of my problem with his
            doctrine: “What about all these people who never had a chance to be
            saved? Why are they going to be roasted in hell for all eternity
            because you didn’t send a missionary to them? Why is your church
            spending as much money as it is at home instead of sending that
            money to the mission fields?”

            Obviously troubled by the question, he attempted several
            rationalizations and then finally blurted out, “Well, if they never
            had a chance to be saved, they are saved!”   “Then why,” I shot back,
            “does your church send missionaries? To give them a chance to be lost?”
 
            He looked like I had hit him in the stomach. He never made an
            attempt to answer that question, but somebody, somewhere, has got to
            answer it. You can’t have it both ways. Why are all these churches
            sending missionaries around the world. If every person alive on the
            face of this planet is going to heaven or hell when he dies, then
            what about “the heathen”? If those who are in ignorance of Christ
            are not destined for hell when they die, they must be going to
            heaven. And if I send a preacher to preach to them and they reject
            the gospel, then they’re going to hell. What a terrible responsibility!
 
            But if they’re not going to heaven, then they obviously are going to
            hell. Then we’re faced with trying to rationalize the nature of a
            God who is good, merciful, compassionate, forgiving, and who “so
            loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever
            believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life,” who
            in turn consigns people to hell fire who never had a chance to hear
            of that Son!

            Most people who say they believe in the doctrine of “hell fire”
            still have a mild discomfiture with the doctrine because it won’t
            stand up to logical scrutiny. There are just too many internal
            contradictions.

            Then why do they cling to it? There are two possible reasons. One,
            they believe it is supported by scripture and that their failure to
            understand the logic of hell is their own failure and inadequacy. In
            other words, there must be a logic there if the Bible tells me it is
            true, even though I can’t see it.

            The other reason people cling to the doctrine of hell fire is that
            it sits firmly on and proceeds logically from another fundamental
            doctrine: the immortality of the soul. If we assume that man has an
            immortal soul, then we are forced to answer the question of what
            happens to that soul at death. If the soul cannot die, then it must
            be alive, and if it’s alive it must be some place. The logic of this
            is so powerful to some people that it overwhelms all other logical
            problems with the doctrine of hell and heaven.

            But the truth is, the Bible does not teach that man has an immortal
            soul. The Bible teaches that man is mortal. That when he dies, he
            returns to the grave. He waits, unconscious, in the grave, until the
            resurrection, and then he meets whatever reward God has in store for
            him.  But just for the moment, let’s lay aside our assumptions about the
            immortality of the soul and let’s look at the doctrine on hell based
            not on an unproven assumption, but on the scriptures themselves.
            What is the true biblical teaching about “hell fire”?
           
Gehenna
            As far as we know the first time Jesus ever referred to “hell fire”
            was in the Sermon on the Mount. As the disciples sat about listening
            to Him, He said: “Whosoever is angry with his brother without cause
            shall be in danger of the judgment. . .but whosoever shall say, Thou
            fool, shall be in danger of hell fire” (Matthew 5:22).

            What do you suppose came into the mind of Jesus’ listeners when He
            used those words: “hell fire”? Was this a new idea to them, or did
            they already have some notion of what “hell fire” was?
            As it happens, the disciples were quite familiar with the term Jesus
            used. Speaking in Aramaic, He called it: “Gehenna fire.”
            Unfortunately, when the English reader sees the word Gehenna, it
            immediately conjures up a preconceived idea. We may have inherited
            that idea from our parents, we may have learned it from preachers,
            or we may simply have picked it up from the use of Gehenna in
            literature for a place of fiery torment and confusion.

            Unfortunately, our preconceived ideas are not always correct. We
            need to keep in mind that Jesus, speaking in the first century, may
            have been saying something quite different from what you or I, the
            twentieth century reader, may assume.

            The truth is, Gehenna was a well-known geographical location–an
            important historic site. When Jesus used the term Gehenna, everyone
            in His audience knew exactly what He was talking about. Gehenna was
            a valley named after the sons of a man named Hinnom. Called in the
            Old Testament “the valley of the son of Hinnom” (Joshua 15:8), it
            was a deep east-to-west valley located about one thousand yards
            south of the temple mount.   Why was this valley significant? To under-
            stand this, you need to acquaint yourself with a period of history well
            known to Jesus' listeners.
 
            About the middle of the eighth century B.C. a wicked king named Ahaz
            reigned in Jerusalem. “Ahaz was twenty years old when he began to
            reign, and he reigned sixteen years in Jerusalem: but he did not
            that which was right in the sight of the Lord, like David his
            father: For he walked in the ways of the kings of Israel, and made
            also molten images for Baalim. Moreover he burnt incense in the
            valley of the son of Hinnom [Gehenna], and burnt his children in the
            fire after the abominations of the heathen whom the Lord had cast
            out before the children of Israel” (2 Chronicles 28:1-3).  Of all the evil
            practices one might imagine, perhaps the most evil of all was burning
            children alive to Molech–one of the hateful gods of the heathen.
 
            Two generations later another wicked king–Manasseh–continued the
            same practice. “Manasseh was twelve years old when he began to
            reign, and he reigned fifty and five years in Jerusalem: But did
            that which was evil in the sight of the Lord, like unto the
            abominations of the heathen, whom the Lord had cast out before the
            children of Israel. . .He reared up altars for Baalim, and made
            groves, and worshiped all the host of heaven, and served them. .
            .And he built altars for all the host of heaven in the two courts of
            the house of the Lord. And he caused his children to pass through
            the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom [Gehenna]: also he
            observed times, and used enchantments, and used witchcraft, and
            dealt with a familiar spirit, and with wizards: he wrought much evil
            in the sight of the Lord, to provoke Him to anger” (2 Chron. 33:1-6).

            In the reign of Manasseh, then, Gehenna, the valley of the son of
            Hinnom, became a center of foul, demonic, corrupt worship to a
            degree that boggles the mind.

            This practice continued until the reign of King Josiah. Josiah
            “broke down the houses of the Sodomites, that were by the house of
            the Lord, where the women wove hangings for the grove. And he
            brought all the priests out of the cities of Judah, and defiled the
            [pagan] high places where the priests had burned incense. . .And he
            defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom
            [Gehenna], that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass
            through the fire to Molech” (2 Kings 23:7-10). Topheth is yet
            another name for Gehenna.

            By the time of Jeremiah, Topheth, the valley of Hinnom, or Gehenna,
            had become the ultimate symbol of corruption and defilement. In the
            nineteenth chapter of Jeremiah, we read a terrible and terrifying
            condemnation of the inhabitants of Jerusalem: “Thus saith the Lord,
            Go and get a potter’s earthen bottle, and take of the ancients of
            the people, and of the ancients of the priests; And go forth unto
            the valley of the son of Hinnom [Gehenna], which is by the entry of
            the east gate, and proclaim there the words that I shall tell thee.
            . .Behold, I will bring evil upon this place, the which whosoever
            heareth, his ears shall tingle. Because they have forsaken me, and
            have estranged this place, and have burned incense in it unto other
            gods, whom neither they nor their fathers have known, nor the kings
            of Judah, and have filled this place with the blood of innocents;
            They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons
            with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor
            spake it, neither came it into my mind: Therefore, behold, the days
            come, saith the Lord, that this place shall be no more called
            Tophet, nor the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of
            slaughter.”

            Jeremiah proceeded to warn the elders and priests that God would
            cause them to fall by the sword before their enemies in the valley
            of Gehenna and that their carcasses would be left there for meat for
            the fowls of the heaven and the beasts of the earth.
            Then Jeremiah broke the bottle in the sight of the men that were
            with him and said to them, “Thus said the Lord of hosts; Even so
            will I break this people and this city, as one breaketh a potter’s
            vessel, that cannot be made whole again: and they shall bury them in
            Tophet [Gehenna], till there be no place to bury.”
            Did the idea of a “Gehenna” originate with God? Was it God who came
            up with the idea of burning people alive in Gehenna fire? Hardly! It
            was a heathen practice to burn children alive to Molech. Israel
            adopted this practice and carried it out in Gehenna. God then
            declares that He will burn those who burned their children–a just
            punishment for them–and that their punishment would take place in
            Tophet–Gehenna. Out of this concept grows the idea of “Gehenna fire.”

            By the time of Jesus, the valley of Gehenna had become a garbage
            dump of the worst sort. The valley of Hinnom was known to all as a
            deep narrow gorge about a thousand yards south of the temple area.
            It became an object of horror to the Jews–doubtless because of the
            pagan sacrifices made there prior to Jeremiah’s day. It is said to
            have been made the receptacle for bones, the bodies of beasts and
            criminals, refuse and all unclean things. Fires are said to have
            been kept perpetually burning in order to consume the foul and
            corrupt objects that were thrown in it. It made a natural and
            unmistakable symbol of dire evil–of absolute ruin and destruction.
            So when Jesus spoke of “Gehenna fire” His audience knew precisely
            what He was talking about. It was a literal valley with literal
            fire. He was speaking of something present, something they could
            walk out and look at. The fires of Gehenna burned perpetually, and
            the smoke ascended up continually.  It was not, however, a place for
            the punishment of the living. It  was a place for the disposal of the
            dishonored and despised dead.

            With all this in mind, then, let’s consider the remainder of Jesus’
            teaching on the subject of hell fire. Take, for example, Matthew
            23:33. Jesus here is condemning the Pharisees and the scribes for
            their hypocrisy (verse 27), and He concludes, “Ye serpents, ye
            generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell
            [Gehenna]?”

            Once again we must place ourselves in Jesus’ audience. If you had
            been standing there and heard Him condemning the Pharisees in this
            way, all you had to do was lift your eyes and look to the south to
            see the smoke arising from the valley of Hinnom–from Gehenna–and
            recall the prophecies of Jeremiah. Mind you, no other interpretation
            of the word Gehenna was known to Jesus’ audience at any time. They
            did not imagine a cavern in the bowels of the earth, with bubbling
            pools of fire, demons tormenting sinners, etc. They visualized a
            foul, defiled, stinking garbage dump where their bodies could be
            dumped to be burned and disposed of–nothing more!

            On another occasion Jesus was encouraging His disciples not to be
            afraid of people who would persecute them for the sake of the truth.
            He said, “Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered,
            that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known. . .And
            fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the
            soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and
            body in hell [Gehenna]” (Mattthew 10:28).

            Think carefully about that verse, and once again place yourself
            among Jesus’ audience. What did they think of when He spoke of
            destroying both soul and body in Gehenna? They thought of a city
            dump with fires burning here and there where their body and soul
            would be destroyed. They did not visualize a place of living torment
            where they survived throughout eternity receiving continual
            punishment by fire. They visualized a place with dead bodies being
            burned.

            Every single time Jesus referred to “hell fire,” He was talking
            about Gehenna. And when He used the word Gehenna He was speaking
            about a literal place then in existence on the south side of
            Jerusalem and all of His audience understood precisely what He meant.

            When we understand this, it should be simple to look at a scripture
            like Mark 9:47-49 and understand precisely what Jesus meant. This is
            a scripture often used by ministers to “prove” hell fire. Jesus
            said, “And if your eye offend you, pluck it out: it is better for
            you to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two
            eyes to be cast into Gehenna fire: Where their worm dieth not, and
            the fire is not quenched.”

            How did Jesus’ audience understand this? They visualized a valley to
            the south of Jerusalem where bodies were eaten with worms and where
            the fires were kept burning and never put out. Somehow from this
            scripture people have gotten the idea that human beings in hell
            don’t die. But the scripture says that it’s the worm that doesn’t  die.

            Does it come as a surprise to you to learn that Jesus never spoke of
            any other type of hell fire? Gehenna was a specific location, well
            known to all Jews, on the surface of the earth. Where then did the
            idea come from that “hell” lies somewhere beneath the surface of the
            earth?
           
Hades
            The King James translators were somewhat indiscriminate in the use
            of the word “hell.” Not only do they translate Gehenna as “hell”
            they also translated a very different word, hades, as “hell.” When
            Jesus spoke of a “hell” beneath the surface of the earth, He used
            the Aramaic equivalent of the Hebrew word sheol. This word is
            universally translated into Greek as hades. It is probably from this
            word that the idea of a subterranean hell derives.

            When Jesus spoke of sheol, the term was once again quite familiar to
            His audience. But none of them visualized sheol as a place of fiery torment.
            Surprisingly, the Old Testament reveals a lot of information about
            hell. It tells us that the direction to hell is down (Psalm 55:15).
            It tells us that it is a deep place (Job 11:8), it is a place from
            which one can be delivered (Proverbs 23:14), it is a place one can
            dig into (Amos 9:2). Jonah even considers the belly of the whale to
            be a “hell” of sorts (Jonah 2:2).

            In the broadest terms, sheol simply means “the abode of the dead.”
            It refers to “where the dead are.” Since most of the dead are
            buried, then hell, in the sense of sheol or hades, is well
            translated by the English word “grave.” But sheol could be
            anywhere–it was simply a place of the dead. We find an interesting
            conjunction of the concepts of hades and Gehenna in one of Jesus’
            parables. It is the parable of Lazarus and the rich man found in
            Luke 16:19-31. Bear in mind as you study this passage that it is a
            parable–it is not a description of an historical event. The point of
            the parable is that if one would not listen to the law of Moses, he
            wouldn’t listen though one came to him from the dead. But in the
            process of making this point, Jesus gives us some interesting
            insights into the fate of wicked men.

            We are told in verse 22 that the rich man died and was buried. Where
            was he when he was buried? Well in sheol or hades of course. Verse
            23 is fascinating. Jesus said, “And in hades he lift up his eyes,
            being in torments, and sees Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.”
            Now if you understand that man does not have an immortal soul, you
            will realize that the described events can only take place after the
            “resurrection to judgment.” Even Lazarus must wait in the grave
            until the resurrection of the just at Christ’s return (1Corinthians
            15:21-23, 52-53; 1 Thessalonians 4:16). The rich man would not be
            raised until a thousand years later (Revelation 20:5-6).
            The events described in Jesus’ parable, then, cannot take place
            until after the second resurrection. As Jesus said, “Marvel not at
            this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the
            graves [sheol] shall hear His voice, and shall come forth; they that
            have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have
            done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation” (John 5:28-29).
            Without the twentieth chapter of Revelation, we might not realize
            that this speaks of two separate and distinct resurrections at least
            a thousand years apart!

            The parable of Lazarus and the rich man, then, speaks of that time
            in the future when the rich man who was in “hell” (sheol, the
            grave), is resurrected to judgment. Since this judgment is a
            judgment by fire, it’s logical to assume it’s talking about Gehenna
            since that’s the only fiery judgment Jesus discusses.

            For our purposes at the moment, however, it’s enough to note that
            there is not one word in this parable about the length of time the
            rich man is tormented by flame. As far as this parable is concerned,
            it could have been a minute, an hour, or a day. While this parable
            clearly shows ultimate punishment by fire, it is utterly silent
            about the duration of punishment. The scripture has no bearing on
            the traditional teaching of eternal torment in the fires of hell.
            Perhaps you’d like to read the parable again to confirm this for yourself.

            It may come as a surprise to you to learn that the traditional
            doctrines of hell simply are not found in the teachings of Jesus
            Christ. Where then are they to be found? Fortunately, the biblical
            references to punishment after death are relatively few, so it won’t
            take us long to trace our way through them. If the doctrine is to be
            found in the pages of the Bible, it should present itself to us
            quite readily. If it can’t be found in the pages of the Bible, we
            have every reason to ask why preachers continue to teach it!

            As it happens, the English word “hell” is only used seven times in
            the New Testament apart from the teachings of Christ.
            The first reference is found in Acts 2:31. Quoting David, Peter
            states: “He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ,
            that His soul was not left in hell [hades], neither His flesh did
            see corruption.” Of course, when we understand the Greek word hades
            simply means the grave, we realize it was the tomb in which Christ’s
            body was placed. That is the “hell” of Acts 2:31. This is not a
            reference to Jesus descending into some fiery hell for three days
            and three nights as some have suggested. There’s nothing complicated
            about this scripture. It just says that Jesus was not left in the grave.

            The second reference is found in James 3:6, “And the tongue is a
            fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that
            it defileth the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature;
            and it is set on fire of hell [Gehenna].” Since we already
            understand the meaning of Gehenna, we can see there is nothing here
            to tell us anything one way or the other about an eternal hell fire.

            The third reference is found in 2 Peter 2:4, “For if God spared not
            the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell [tartaros], and
            delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto
            judgment. . .” Now this is an interesting scripture, because this is
            neither Gehenna nor hades. It uses a different Greek word tartaros:
            “The name of a subterranean region, doleful and dark, regarded by
            the ancient Greeks as the abode of the wicked dead, where they
            suffer punishment for their evil deeds” (Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon).
 
            What is interesting about this passage is that tartaros is regarded
            by both Peter and the classical Greek writers as a place of
            darkness. But fire gives off light! Doubtless one can explain his
            way around it, but how does it happen that the traditional idea of
            hell is a place of flames and coals of fire while the place where
            wicked spirits are is a place of darkness? If wicked human beings
            are confined in a fiery hell, they are in a place of considerable
            light while demons are confined to a place of darkness. Are then
            wicked human beings not in the same place as wicked spirits?

            In any case, 2 Peter 2:4 is about the fate of fallen angels, not the
            fate of wicked men. Their fate is described by Jude as being
            “reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of
            the great day” (verse 6), and “wandering stars, to whom is reserved
            the blackness of darkness for ever” (verse 13). Of course, none of this
            is of any help at all in establishing the traditional doctrines of hell fire.

            The fourth reference to hell is found in Revelation 1:18. Here Jesus
            is quoted as saying, “I am He that liveth, and was dead; and,
            behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell
            [hades] and of death.” Since hades refers to the grave it is obvious
            that Jesus has the power to unlock the graves, to unlock death and
            to release men in the resurrection. Again, we find no support for
            the traditional doctrines of hell.

            The fifth reference is found in Revelation 6:8. Here we find the
            fourth of the seven seals of Revelation–the “pale horse.” In vision,
            John looked, “and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him
            was Death, and Hell [hades] followed with him. . .” There is nothing
            difficult in this scripture. Death rides on a pale horse, and the
            grave follows him. It is just a metaphor for describing widespread
            death.

            The sixth and seventh references are found in Revelation 20:13-14.
            Beginning in verse 11, John describes a great white throne and a day
            of judgment. He continues: “And the sea gave up the dead which were
            in it; and death and hell [hades] delivered up the dead which were
            in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
            And death and hell [hades] were cast into the lake of fire. This is
            the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of
            life was cast into the lake of fire.”

            This is an important passage for understanding hell, for even though
            the word hades means “the grave,” this scripture rules out the
            traditional idea of hell as a place of permanent torment from which
            one cannot be delivered. Here “hell” is required to deliver up its
            dead. Ultimately, both death and the abode of the dead are destroyed
            in a lake of fire.

            Isn’t it interesting that not one of the New Testament references
            have anything at all to say in support of the traditional doctrines
            of hell fire?

            But the observant reader will have noted that there is here a
            reference to a lake of fire. Could this be the kind of “hell” of
            which Jesus spoke? Absolutely! For indeed there is to come a time
            when a great sea of fire, such as lava, or molten rock, become the
            ultimate destruction of the wicked. But what happens to a human
            being when you cast him into a lake of molten fire? Obviously, he is
            incinerated. There is no suggestion of even a lingering death, much
            less eternal punishment.

            There are only five references to the lake of fire in the New
            Testament, all of them late in the book of Revelation. The first of
            these is found in Revelation 19:20: “And the beast was taken, and
            with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with
            which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and
            them that worshiped his image. These both were cast alive into a
            lake of fire burning with brimstone.”

            Again, what happens to human beings who are thrown alive into a lake
            of fire burning with brimstone? They are incinerated. They are
            killed. They are destroyed. There is no suggestion here of eternal
            torment in a fiery hell.

            The second reference to the lake of fire is found in Revelation
            20:10. Here we are told that the devil is cast into the lake of fire
            and brimstone, “Where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall
            be tormented day and night for ever and ever.” Look at the verse
            carefully. It is the devil who is being thrown into this lake of
            fire and brimstone, and it is the devil who is to be tormented day
            and night forever and ever. The devil is a spirit being and cannot
            be destroyed by fire. The beast and false prophet are human and most
            assuredly can be destroyed by fire. If you will look carefully at
            the verse, you’ll note that the word “are” in the King James Version
            is in italics. That means it’s not in the original Greek text. The
            Greek language uses these ellipses commonly and they must be filled
            in to make sense in English. Unfortunately, the word “are” is
            probably misleading in this verse. One could just as easily say that
            the devil was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the
            beast and false prophet were cast.

            Once again we are left with a verse that tells us nothing about
            eternal torment for human beings. The devil is going to be tormented
            for ever and ever, and it would seem that he would like for us to
            believe that we will share his fate. Nothing could be further from
            the truth. We have already discussed the third and fourth reference
            found in Revelation 20:14-15, so we can turn to the final reference
            in Revelation 21:8. Here we are told that, “The fearful, and
            unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
            and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part
            in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone; which is the second
            death.” But notice that this is not eternal life in hell fire, but
            the second death. Death is the cessation of life, not its
            continuation in another place! And again, what happens to a fearful
            or unbelieving man when he is thrown into a lake which burns with
            fire and brimstone? He is incinerated! Once again we are left with
            no evidence to support the traditional doctrines of hell fire.

            But isn’t there a reference somewhere to people being tormented with
            fire and brimstone and the smoke of their torment ascending up
            forever and ever? Yes, there is. The reference is found in
            Revelation 14:9-11. You may wish to read the entire passage
            carefully. The third angel says with a loud voice that if any man
            worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark in his
            forehead, or in his hand, that same shall drink of the wine of the
            wrath of God. Not only that, he shall be “tormented with fire and
            brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of
            the Lamb.” But notice if this is talking about the traditional idea
            of hell, it takes place with all the holy angels and Jesus Christ
            Himself right there while the torment is going on! Is Jesus Christ
            going to spend all eternity in hell? Of course not!

            Let’s pause and think about this for a moment. On the night before
            His crucifixion, Jesus told His disciples, “In my Father’s house are
            many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to
            prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I
            will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there
            you may be also” (John 14:2-3).

            Clearly, when Jesus Christ returns all the saints will be with Him
            wherever He is. If then the torment with fire, brimstone, and
            eternal smoke takes place in the presence of the Lamb, then it takes
            place in the presence of the saints as well! Think about it. Could
            you be happy for all eternity witnessing the excruciating fire and
            torture of hundreds of thousands of lost souls? Would a sainted
            mother have to spend all eternity observing the torture of one of
            her sons who turned out to be a lost sinner?

            If this verse is a description of the traditional “hell fire” then
            not only the damned will be there, but Jesus Christ and the saints
            as well! If this is hell, then there is no place except hell! On
            careful examination, the whole idea dissolves into absurdity.

            If you’ll study Revelation 14:9-11 in its context, you’ll find that
            it takes place right at the very end time. Jesus Christ has just
            returned to the earth for His saints, and is in the process of
            bringing a halt to human violence. This event takes place just
            before the seven last plagues are poured out (notice chapter 16).
            Those who drink of the wine of the wrath of God and are tormented
            with fire and brimstone are not souls in hell, but living human
            beings who are still in rebellion against God this late in history.
            Continuing with verse 11, “And the smoke of their torment ascendeth
            up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who
            worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of
            his name.”

            The perpetual smoke mentioned here is simply an antitype of the
            perpetual fires in Gehenna. The mere fact that the smoke continually
            ascends up says nothing about the survival of those who are being
            burned. Also, notice that it says they have no rest day nor night
            who worship (Greek: “are worshiping,” present tense) the beast.
            These are living people who are still worshiping the beast, still
            bearing about his image and the mark of his name. These are living
            human beings, not souls in hell.

            This same time is spoken of in 2Thessalonians 1:7-8, where the
            return of Christ is described in powerful terms: “And to you who are
            troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from
            heaven with His mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on
            them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord
            Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction
            from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of His power.”

            Notice that it is living human beings who receive God’s vengeance,
            who are incinerated by flaming fire at Christ’s return. Notice also,
            that their punishment is everlasting (permanent) destruction. The
            word destruction is meaningless if there is not a point where the
            destruction is complete. In other words, you can’t keep on
            destroying something for all eternity. It’s a contradiction in terms.

            But, someone else will ask, “Isn’t there a statement somewhere about
            eternal fire”? Yes, there is. In Jude 7, we read: “Even as Sodom and
            Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving
            themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are
            set forth for an example, suffering vengeance of eternal fire.” But
            bear in mind that the word eternal describes the nature of the fire
            that destroys, not the nature of the material that is destroyed.
            Sodom and Gomorrah are not still burning. The cities “suffered”
            (past tense) the vengeance of “eternal fire.” The fire was from the
            Eternal, and the source of the flame itself may well be eternal. But
            the combustible material it ignited was not.

            And so as we continue our study through the New Testament, we find
            ourselves utterly devoid of any biblical support for the traditional
            doctrine of hell.

            Where then, does it come from? Perhaps to some extent from
            apocryphal Jewish writings. In the book of Judith, for example, the
            vengeance of the day of judgment is described as “fire and worms” in
            the flesh of those who rise up against Israel which “they shall feel
            and weep forever” (16:17). In another book the fate of the tyrant is
            declared to be “eternal torture by fire,” and “interminable
            torments” (4th Maccabees 9:8-9; 10:10). Yet another of these books
            speaks of the “furnace of hell,” and of the despisers of the Most
            High as doomed to be “henceforth in torments, always in pain and
            anguish of seven kinds” (4th Esdras 7:36, 79, 80).

            But at this point one is reminded of Paul’s warning to Titus, “Not
            giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn
            from the truth” (Titus 1:14). According to Josephus, at least two
            Jewish sects, the Pharisees and the Essenes believed in everlasting
            punishment. Even some of the great Rabbis who spoke of limited
            punishment made exceptions for certain classes of sinners. The
            school of Hillel taught that sinners of the heathen and others were
            punished in Gehenna for a space of twelve months, and afterward were
            consumed; but that Christians, Epicureans, and those who deny the
            divine origin of the Torah, the truth of the resurrection, and those
            who sin like Jeroboam are said to go down to Gehenna to be punished
            there to ages of ages.

            So it’s entirely possible that the Christian tradition of an
            ever-burning hell fire was derived, not from the Scriptures, not
            from the teachings of Jesus, but from Jewish traditions!
            Well then, is there really a hell fire after all?   Absolutely!
 
            As we have already seen, there is a resurrection to judgment. At the
            very end of history, when every man has heard the Gospel and every
            man has had a chance to be saved, then everyone who “was not found
            written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire”
            (Revelation 20:15).

            Is there an ultimate punishment for wicked men? The glorified Christ
            answers that question in His revelation to John: “But the fearful,
            and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and
            whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall
            have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone
            which is the second death” (Rev. 21:8).  There is justice with God!

            There is also virtually limitless mercy. To those who repent; to
            those who turn from their sins, receive Jesus Christ as personal
            Savior; as their Lord, who rules in their lives–as their
            ever-present High Priest, and their soon-coming KING, there is
            salvation! That means living forever–in the Kingdom of God–not being
            destroyed by a veritable sea of flames, which will render the wicked
            as ashes under the feet of the righteous (Malachi 4:1).
            
Bible Study Notes - A Second Chance?
            Are there just two kinds of people in the world – the saved and the
            lost? Are babies born “lost?” If a baby dies in infancy, does he go
            to heaven or hell? If heaven, then at what age is sin imputed and
            this child becomes lost? What about the heathen, who has never heard
            the name of Jesus, is he lost and dependant upon a missionary to
            tell him about Christ dying for his sins? What if a missionary has a
            flat tire and never makes it to see him? Will he go to hell because
            a flat tire prevented the missionary from making it? How can God
            hold this heathen responsible? Do we all suffer because of “original
            sin?” Jesus identified two resurrections – the resurrection to life
            and to judgment. How do these resurrections and the Valley of Dry
            Bones, mentioned in the old Negro spiritual, fit into this puzzle.
            Telephone or write to the number or address listed, and ask for your
            free copy of the Bible Study Notes, A Second Chance? and see all of
            the pieces fit into a logical and fascinating puzzle.
           
“The Hope of Mankind”
            Have you grieved over a child or a loved-one who died without being
            baptized? Regardless of a person’s beliefs, it is rare for him to
            believe that God sends babies or children into the flames of hell.
            And, he is right! The Hope of Mankind is one of the most encouraging
            sermons you will ever hear. This insightful message debunks many
            popular myths as it replaces them with simple biblical truths. You
            will see the false assumptions upon which these teachings are built.
            It shows you a merciful God whose will it is that all come to
            repentance and be saved. Among other things, you’ll learn the
            importance of the resurrections and when these take place

Christian Educational Ministries,  P.O. Box 560  Whitehouse, Texas 75791
Phone: (903) 509-2999  1-888-BIBLE-44  Fax: (903) 509-1139
www.borntowin.net
©2002 All Rights Reserved
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »